zBoneman.com -- Home Movie Reviews

Charlie and The Chocolate Factory - Imax (2005)

Charlie and The Chocolate Factory - Imax
"I kinda get what you're going for Johnny - whaddaya say we try going Wilder?

Starring:

Johnny Depp
Freddie Highmore
David Kelly
Helena Bonham Carter and Deep Roy

Released By:

Warner Brothers

Released In:

2005

Rated:

PG-13

Reviewed By:

Adam Mast

Grade:

B-

Buy this item at Amazon.com
zBoneman on Rotten Tomatoes

Charlie and the Chocolate Factory is a visual stunner that, from what I recall, does attempt to be a little more faithful to the book than the 1971 film that starred the wonderful Gene Wilder, but somehow, it doesn't quite maintain the same sort of magic. Not for me anyway. That's not to say that I consider the original film a classic. It is terrific entertainment, but the Wizard of Oz it ain't.

For the few of you not familiar, Charlie and the Chocolate Factory is the tale of little Charlie. He and his family are extremely poor, but manage to get through life with a smile. Every now and again, grandpa Joe (David Kelly) tells Charlie (Freddie Highmore) whimsical stories of his own past which revolve mostly around his job working for the eccentric candy maker Willy Wonka (Johnny Depp). As Joe explains it, Wonka eventually fired all his employees as he became increasingly tired of spies revealing his secret recipes to other candy makers. Upon laying off hundreds of workers, Wonka mysteriously vanishes into the confines of his enormous candy factory never to be heard from again. This isn't to say that Wonka stops producing his world famous chocolate. Far from it. He continues to make candy, but everyone is clueless as to who actually helps him in his confectionary endeavors.

One cold, and snowy morning, Wonka reveals himself to the world again through a most exciting press release. The candy maker announces that he will allow five children to take a tour of his factory should they find a golden ticket in one of his famous Wonka chocolate bars.

As fate would have it, hopeful dreamer Charlie is one of the lucky five. Along with his enthusiastic grandfather, the two embark on a fanciful tour of Wonka's legendary Chocolate Factory, accompanied by an extremely odd host and four other children with serious behavioral issues.

This version of Roald Dahl's beloved tale was directed by visionary Tim Burton and truth be told, had anyone else been attached to this project, I probably would have been nervous about it. Charlie and the Chocolate Factory just seems to be the perfect kind of story for Burton to tell, and in fact, much of the way the picture unfolds reminded me of some of the director's other works, most notably Edward Scissorhands (like Edward, the reclusive Willy Wonka remains hidden away in a most enormous abode).

How does this version measure up to the 70's take? While some might argue that it isn't fair to compare the two films, I will say this one does look better (and that impressive look is greatly enhanced in the Imax format). The cinematography and art direction in particular, are top notch. I just love the look of this picture. The inside of the Factory is basically an edible version of Disneyland. An enormous, colorful fortress in which nearly everything in sight is a tasty treat. And for the most part, it is an actual set. My initial fear was that they would just CG everything. As far as I can tell, the majority of what you will see is a live set, and if not, my hats off to the effects crew.

There are some terrific performances here. Freddie Highmore (who also starred alongside Depp in the heartfelt Finding Neverland) is fantastic in the lead. While his Charlie doesn't have much money, he has an enormous heart, and young Highmore makes us believe. David Kelly is sensational as Charlie's loving (and lively) grandfather. The moment he realizes he'll be visiting the domain of his old boss, he's like a kid again. David Morris is terrific as grandpa George. At a glance, he seems like a jerk, but before long, it's obvious that he just so happens to be the type of guys who likes to tell things as they are. We never doubt his love for Charlie. Christopher Lee shows up in a bit part as Willy's stern, candy hater of a father-- not surprising given that he also happens to be a dentist. Deep Roy has the daunting task of playing hundreds of Oompa Loompas (the little people who help Wonka in his day to day operations), and while this feat is achieved through the miracle of digitalization, Roy manages to shine through during several clever moments.

The other children in the picture are intentionally over the top in their brattiness, and quite effective, although I must admit, some of these kids are downright creepy. When little chocolate fiend Augustus (Philip Wiegratz) is first revealed, I thought I was looking at some sort of bizarre Polar Express out take. He seriously looked like a product of the motion capture process to me and it really creeped me out.

Surprisingly, Depp mostly misses the mark as the eccentric Wonka. I'm a huge fan of this gifted actor, and you'd think Wonka would be the perfect fit for him given the odd and creative juice that flow through most of his characters. Strangely though, his goofy grin, white clacking teeth, and reclusive manner don't suit the role. Not for me anyway. When I think about the owner of the world's most fantastical chocolate factory, I think of someone lively and bigger than life, not someone withdrawn and introverted. While I certainly give props to Depp for trying something new as opposed to doing a mere carbon copy of Gene Wilder's persona, he just didn't get there for me. He puts this sort of weird Michael Jackson spin on the role (only here, he isn't a particular fan of children) and it comes across as strange and creepy when I guess I was hoping for funny and enchanting. The Boneman observed that he saw shades of Eric McCormack's character Will from TV's Will and Grace. In the end, Depp does have a few cute moments, but overall, I found him too subdued - and he was unable to generate any comic energy.

Danny Elfman's score is stunning. It's big, lush and near perfect. However, Elfman's Oompa Loompa songs didn't quite work for me. I do like them isolated. A couple of them sound like they might be Oingo Boingo B-Sides. In particular, I love the "Veruca Salt" number, but somehow, these songs seem odd and intrusive in the context of the film. This is disheartening given that Elfman's tunes in The Nightmare Before Christmas were absolutely in keeping with tone of that movie.

Tim Burton is clearly in his element here. He's given the opportunity to do what he does best in terms of creating breathtaking visual splendor. With Charlie and the Chocolate Factor, he is able go off with his typical gothic sensibility, but he also makes great use of bright, vibrant colors. The world he's created is a stunning one.

My biggest problem with this interpretation is John August's screenplay. For the most part he is faithful to Dahl's book, but I personally feel that there were times when Mel Stuart actually improved upon the source material in his interpretation. For example, I much prefer Wonka's big introduction in the 70's film (that whole cane gimmick and tumble thing is just pure magic), and I also loved the ending of that picture in which a pure and innocent Charlie opts to return the Everlasting Gobstopper to Wonka rather than trading it in to the mysterious Slugworth for buckets of cash. In this version, the screenplay goes in a different route in both cases. Wonka's introduction here is more goofy than lively, and the ending of the picture is more in keeping with the family theme that sort of flows throughout the picture. These aren't completely distracting alterations mind you, but I couldn't help but mention them for obvious reasons. Aside from that, this version unfolds in a similar fashion with a few clever changes along the way. I loved a creative homage to 2001: A Space Odyssey that occurs towards the end of the film.

Sadly though, much of this picture is lacking in magic and humor. It certainly has moments, but not consistently. I can understand that the book is darker around the edges and I appreciate the introduction of darker elements, but Charlie and the Chocolate Factory is also joyful and whimsical in nature, and I didn't always feel that in this version. It should also be noted that there are inclusions in this adaptation that don't belong at all. I liked the flashbacks giving us insight into what makes Willy Wonka tick, but the dramatic payoff that these flashbacks lead to don't really pack much of an emotional wallop. A similar such plot line in Burton's Big Fish worked much more effectively. And the brief Oompa Loompa back story in which we see where these odd creatures come from is unnecessary. It completely took me out of the moment.

Perhaps the biggest irony revolving around this Charlie and the Chocolate Factory lies in the title itself. I find it odd that the 70's picture was called Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory when that film clearly spent more time developing Charlie's character. This version's title has been restored to the same title as the book, but this picture spends much more time giving us insight into who Willy is. Strange.

Burton is a true visionary, there's no doubt about that. I enjoyed his take on Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, but I wouldn't rank it amongst the director's finest work. I still hold Edward Scissorhands and the underrated Ed Wood at the top of this list. This movie is certainly visually sumptuous, but that magical tone I was hoping for was all too scarce. I suppose I just didn't find the movie - if you'll pardon the pun - sweet enough.

On a side note, if you do go to see this film, do yourself a favor and check it out in Imax. The enormous screen size really allows the audience to see all the intricate detail that went into the making of this movie. And seeing Wonka's enormous Chocolate Factory in such scope is a special added treat.

:: zBoneman.com Reader Comments ::

June A

June A

Oh the movie was wonderful! i love johnny depp even when he does look all weird. he's just an excellent actor and everyone did a fantastic job and it was a great updated version of the film..

kasim

kasim

I read somewhere that Gene Wilder was opposed to this remake - at the time I must thought it sounded like sour grapes but after witnessing J Depps piss-weak revamp of his character I can see why he was worried. I think you rated it a bit too high. It had it's entertaining moments but the bottom line is it just wasn't funny and this is directly attributable to Depps lame take on such a colorful character. C- in my book!

Terry

Terry

I just have a question. In the scene where they come to a room full of extremely wooly pink sheep and Willy says he didn't want to talk about it, is there an inside joke there that I am missing? Also off the subject, I am waiting for your review of Dark Water.

Martha Woolridge

Martha Woolridge

Maybe if I would have seen the film in an IMAX theater I might have come away with a more favorable opinion of it - but the bottom line is that Depp wasn't funny - the film offered precious few laughs and it was too tame - never taking any of the chances that the original did. Depp's big reunion with his father was just hollow and weak and though most of the other actors did a good job, I couldn't tell you one scene in the film that I particularly liked. Strangely I don't remember much about it at all. Overrated by a mile.

Jasper Waterfellow

Jasper Waterfellow

Charlie and the Chocolate Factory showed a lot of courage on Tim Burton's part and also plenty of trust in his go-to guy Johnny Depp. Depp's performance isn't his best but i think it was wise not to go the same route as Gene Wilder. There would have been no way to top it - though I guess it would have been interesting to see what a Jim Carry or a Will Farrell might have done with it. All in all I felt like it was entertaining though I agree there were few laughs to be found. when I left the theater I felt like the critics would probably savage it for any number of reasons and I find it a little surprising that they've come out in support of it. It seemed like such an easy target. Pretty much agree with your review Adam - the biggest problem was Depp - and I never thought I'd have that problem with a film the rest of my life. Looking forward to POTC 2 (that's Pirates of the Carribean not Passion of the Christ) Cheers and keep up the good work - gents love this site.

Dave Wasserman

Dave Wasserman

I'm absolutley aghast that this film is being so widely hailed by critics. I found it unentertaining and dull, and not once do I remember laughing during the whole damn thing. Your review is right - depp just didn't cut it as Wonka and I think the whole movie hinges on that. I mean didn't Gene Wilder carry Willie Wonka on his back - and that movie like you say isn't exactly a masterpiece, but at least it was fun and funny. I don't think there's anything sacred about remaking films - I just think if you're gonna do it - take it to a new level. Charlie and the CC was just stillborn - I would have given it a C- because I liked most of the other performances - but with a dim Depp you can't go any higher than that

Add your own comment here and see it posted immediately!
Name: e-Mail:
Comment:
Spam Prevention Check:
Please enter the following code in the box below.
Security Image