zBoneman.com -- Home

Movie Reviews

Far From Heaven (2002)

Far From Heaven
Personally, I don't care which period piece I win for, I just want to win . . . Period.


Julianne Moore
Dennis Quaid
Dennis Haysbert

Released By:


Released In:




Reviewed By:

Adam Mast



Buy this item at Amazon.com
zBoneman on Rotten Tomatoes

From it's opening credits, Far From Heaven emulates the 50's melodrama with absolute perfection. While it is a homage to the works of Douglas Sirk, it takes on a personae all it's own thanks to creative direction and a sharply written screenplay by Todd Haynes.

Far From Heaven features Julianne Moore in a riveting turn as Cathy Whitaker, a near perfect 50's housewife who desperately tries to keep it together after learning that her husband Frank (a fantastic Dennis Quaid) may be having an affair. With nowhere to turn, she strikes up an unlikely friendship with Raymond Deagan, her African American gardener (wonderfully played by 24's Dennis Haysbert). Of course such friendships were frowned upon in this particular era, and this creates quite a stir among the local town folk. Initially, what struck me most about Far From Heaven was it's grasp on the time period. The art direction is uncanny while the dialogue is absolutely dead on. As the movie progressed, I became completely wrapped up in the stellar performances of the three leads.

Julianne Moore is breathtaking as a woman who, despite much heartache, must remain strong through difficult times. Moore is spellbinding, bringing passion and vulnerability to this terrific character.

The forever underrated Dennis Quaid turns in one of the strongest performances of his career as Frank, Kathy's confused husband. He is both subtle and sad as a man with a dark secret. And last but certainly not least is Dennis Haysbert, an actor I've been fond of ever since his hilarious turn as Pedro Cerrano in Major League. I've also admired his commanding performance as the President on TV's 24. Here, he's graceful as Raymond and brings a sense of honesty and sweetness to the role.

The only complaint I have with this film is that the relationship that takes place between Frank and his new love interest--is definitely rushed. It happens midway through the film and it felt underdeveloped. But then this movie isn't so much about that incident as it is about the effect it has on Kathy's life.

This is a groundbreaking achievement for writer/director Todd Haynes. While I'm not completely familiar with the works of Douglas Sirk, it is quite obvious that Haynes did his homework on 50's melodrama--this picture feels as if it were made in the 50's. What's more striking is that he's added elements that would have been considered too taboo during the time. This makes Far From Heaven all the more intriguing, especially given that it deals with subject matter that is all the more relevant today.

With perfect lighting, spectacular cinematography, picture perfect art direction, stellar performances and a sure handed Haynes in control, this is easily one of the best films of the year. Far From Heaven isn't far from perfect.

:: zBoneman.com Reader Comments ::

Carl Mineola

Carl Mineola

Far From Heaven was the most frustrating and disappointing movies in recent memory. So many critics raved about it, but I honestly haven't talked to anyone who liked it at all. Dennis Haysbert was the only good thing about it - and I absolutely loathed Dennis Quaid in this movie - which had nothing to do with the homosexual angle, I just thought it was basd acting period. The ending was so frustrating that it really pissed me off. I felt I'd been sold a pretty shabby bill of goods and I hope somebody reading this agrees.

Eileen Barker

Eileen Barker

Agreed, the look of this film was sumptuous and the acting, particularly Haysbert and Moore, was great. But I was slighlty put off by the ending, particularly when you consider how much you've invested into the relationship. I really feel like Quaid's performance was off and totally overated and in my mind Moore's similar performance in The Hours was far more affecting and award-worthy.



A wonderful looking film that had a world of promise but unlimately chickened out and though it shared much in common with the vignette from The Hours, Hours is a far more affecting and intelligent film, Looks and Brains, that's what a movie should be all about.

Add your own comment here and see it posted immediately!
Name: e-Mail:
Spam Prevention Check:
Please enter the following code in the box below.
Security Image