zBoneman.com -- Home

Movie Reviews

Masked and Anonymous (2003)

Masked and Anonymous
"Dude, I don't want to be in this movie. I'm seriously thinking about making a run for it - you with me?"

Starring:

Bob Dylan
Jeff Bridges
John Goodman
Jessica Lange
Ed Harris
Val Kilmer

Released In:

2003

Rated:

PG-13

Reviewed By:

The Boneman

Grade:

C-

Buy this item at Amazon.com
zBoneman on Rotten Tomatoes

Masked and Anonymous is perhaps one of the most difficult movies I've ever had to describe let alone critique. It should first be noted that this Bob Dylan-centered surreal carnival of a film features a veritable who's who of actors. Next to JFK this is probably the best (Seven degrees of Kevin Bacon linker, period). How about Jeff Bridges, Jessica Lange (King Kong) Bridges and John Goodman (The Big Lebowsky) Bridges and Christian Slater (Tucker) Slater, Chris Penn and Val Kilmer (True Romance) Goodman and Lange (Everybody's All American) Lange and Ed Harris (Sweet Dreams) there's more. Also in the film are Penelope Cruz, Luke Wilson, Giovanni Ribisi, Angela Bassett, Mickey Roarke and probably a few I'm forgetting.

Was this a good film. Honestly I'd say no. But it is a fascinating one, unlike just about any film I've ever seen. It takes place in some sort of fictitious war-torn third world nation, where Jack Fate (Bob Dylan) is released from a squalid prison in order to perform a benefit concert, mainly aimed at raising enough money to bail John Goodman out of a debt that is threatening his life. Jessica Lange is somehow involved as a media liaison and she spends the film walking around looking strung out and slovenly. For Bob Dylan's part, he acquits himself well enough although he appears to be rather uncomfortable with the proceedings - probably because he realizes that the whole thing is basically wack.

The look of the film is like something out of a Frida Kahlo nightmare, and the dialogue consists of lengthy polemic diatribes that are almost Shakespearean in their length and language. The performances are solid, all of these actors seem to take what they're doing serious and they all manage to keep a straight face, during some of the most absurd cinematic conditions I've ever seen. At the time, I'm sure, none of them knew what the hell this movie was going to end up like. On the upside the film has a wonderful soundtrack, comprised mostly of Dylan classics and a few Grateful Dead and Los Lobos gems - best of all there is alot of footage featuring Dylan performing live.

Still in order for a movie to succeed the audience at least needs a vague clue as to what's going on, and writer Larry Charles (Seinfeld) keeps the proceedings so completely inscrutable that even by Bergman standards this movie is likely to leave you in the dust.
In it's defense it was a brave experiment, packed with A-list actors and if nothing else it is a wonderful tribute to one of the 3 best songwriters that ever lived.

:: zBoneman.com Reader Comments ::

Jake

Jake

You, like about every other writer in the world completely missed the point of this film. The film was a visual rendering of Dylan's work. With rare exception all of Dylan's songs are subjective and open to interpretaion of the listener. I think this is the point Charles was trying to get across. Besides, just the music alone makes the film a good way to spend your time.

Nightmare

Nightmare

I agree with your assessment of this film i do however think you should have knocked this down a few more notches for wasting a record amount of acting talent. I still have no idea of what this movie is supposed to be about and event though the person who responded had an idea, I hardly think that qualifies as a reason to make a movie.

Add your own comment here and see it posted immediately!
Name: e-Mail:
Comment:
Spam Prevention Check:
Please enter the following code in the box below.
Security Image